A Guide to Wine, Food & the Good Life
To subscribe and be notified anytime we post a new article, enter your email address in the box below, then click on Subscribe Now.

Underground Wine Line

Similar Articles:

  1. 2016 STUPID WINE DESCRIPTION AWARD WINNERS AND MORE!
  2. HAPPY NEW YEAR 2017!
  3. BURGUNDY – 2016 VISIT
  4. YIKES! THE 1000 POINT WINE SCORE IS HERE
  5. CHAMPAGNE DAY 2016
  6. OUTSTANDING OLD MARSANNAY ROSÉS
  7. A MONTE BELLO TOAST TO PAUL DRAPER
  8. THE PERILS OF FARMING – MOTHER NATURE DEVESTATES BURGUNDY
  9. DO YOU KNOW WHAT TIME OF YEAR IT IS ON THE WINE CALENDAR?
  10. THE DAILY MEAL WINERY AWARDS
  11. STUPID WINE DESCRIPTION OF THE YEAR?
  12. HAPPY NEW YEAR 2016!
  13. ENCORE: DEAR SANTA, WE’VE GOT A LITTLE LIST
  14. BACK TO THE FUTURE
  15. A VIEW OF THE 2015 BURGUNDY VINTAGE IN ADVANCE OF THE ANNUAL UNDERGROUND WINELETTER TRIP TO BURGUNDY TO TASTE THE 2014S
  16. I HATE TO TELL YOU “I TOLD YOU SO” BUT “I TOLD YOU SO!”
  17. WHAT’S IN YOUR WINE GLASS?
  18. MORE ON BIB WINE
  19. THE JUDGMENT OF MOSCOW
  20. ROSÉ WINES AND THE GREAT ROSÉS OF PROVENCE
  21. A SHOT OUT OF THE BLUE: WE HAVE A NEW ENTRY IN THE WINE INGREDIENT LABELING DERBY
  22. PREMOX: “WHEREFORE ART THOU?”
  23. HAPPY NEW YEAR 2015!
  24. PREVIEW: ALONG THE BUGUNDY TRAIL VINTAGE 2013
  25. CAUTION! WHAT’S IN YOUR WINE?
  26. FOR THE LOVE OF ROSÉS
  27. THE BEST WINERIES IN AMERICA - THE TOP 3 ARE FROM CALIFORNIA'S CENTRAL COAST!
  28. STOP THE PRESSES! THERE IS A NEW SCORING SYSTEM!
  29. WINE WRITING – WHAT IS IT?
  30. POLYESTER WINES
  31. HAPPY NEW YEAR 2014!
  32. THE UNDERGROUND IS BACK!
  33. CALLING TIME OUT
  34. ROSÉ - IT’S TIME HAS COME
  35. ARE NUTRITIONAL LABELS COMING TO ALCOHOLIC DRINKS?
  36. THE BLENDING GAME: ROSÉ & MORE
  37. ATTENTION ALL WINE CONSUMERS: WINE INGREDIENT LABELING IS HERE!
  38. EXCLUSIVE NEWS FLASH!
  39. THE GREATER FOOL?
  40. DOMAINE ALBERT GRIVAULT
  41. TASTING WINE VS. DRINKING WINE - IS THERE A DIFFERENCE?
  42. A PAIR TO DRAW TO & A GUIDE FOR WHAT TO LOOK FOR IN WINES THAT ARE FOOD FRIENDLY, BALANCED, AND CAPABLE OF AGING FOR AN EXTENDED TIME
  43. HAPPY NEW YEAR 2013!
  44. THE UNDERGROUND HISTORY AS WE BRIEFLY LOOK BACK AND THEN CONTINUE TO FOCUS ON THE FUTURE
  45. BYE BYE BIG KAHUNA
  46. A LOOK AT NV CHAMPAGNE – IS IT REALLY DIFFERENT THIS TIME?
  47. FAKE WINES IN CHINA - THE BEAT GOES ON
  48. 2011 BURGUNDY – THE SURPRISE VINTAGE
  49. THE MARRIAGE BLEND
  50. LOOKING FOR OLD WINE WITH IMPECCABLE PROVENANCE?
  51. WINE FRAUD AND A WINE DETECTIVE - THE STORY OF DON CORNWELL
  52. HISTORIC VINEYARD SOCIETY
  53. DON’T GET YOUR KNICKERS IN A TWIST!
  54. THE BLENDING GAME - IS IT TIME FOR THREE BUCK CHUCK?
  55. EVERYTHING YOU HAVE BEEN DYING TO KNOW ABOUT NEWLY RELEASED CALIFORNIA CHARDONNAYS!
  56. COUNTERFEIT WINE AND THE ROLE OF CHINA
  57. THE JUDGMENT OF PRINCETON
  58. WHEN TO TASTE, DRINK, & ENJOY YOUNG WINES & WHAT ABOUT ROSÉ?
  59. THE VINEYARD OR THE WINEMAKING? WHAT REALLY MATTERS?
  60. BLENDING GAME PREVIEW
  61. PREDICTING THE FUTURE!
  62. AMATEUR NIGHT AT THE WINE FOLLIES: THE ANSWER WAS LYING IN PLAIN SIGHT
  63. THE PERFECT WINE?
  64. ATTENTION COSTCO WINE SHOPPERS: WHEN IS A ROSÉ NOT A ROSÉ?
  65. NAPA VALLEY WINES – JUST WHEN I THOUGHT WE HAD SEEN EVERYTHING!
  66. THE WINE FRAUD STORY – THE BEAT GOES ON!
  67. DO WINE AND TOILET PAPER HAVE ANYTHING IN COMMON?
  68. WINE JUSTICE STRIKES!
  69. FOODIES FIGHTING FOR FOIE!
  70. CALLING ALL WINE INVESTORS
  71. ONE WINEDRINKER’S OBSERVATIONS OVER NEARLY 30 YEARS: TWO FACES OF FRAUD? MORE TO COME?
  72. NEWS FLASH -- NEW ALCOHOL WARNING LABELS FOR WINE MAY SOON BE ISSUED!
  73. ROSÉ IS THE PERFECT ANTI WINE
  74. AN ENIGMA WRAPPED IN A RIDDLE – CAN AN UGLY DUCKLING BECOME A SWAN?
  75. STOP THE WINE PRESS! THE FBI HAS MOVED TO STOP WINE FRAUD!
  76. 2004 WHITE BURGUNDIES: PREMOX OR NOT? THE BEAT GOES ON!
  77. GOOD NEWS BAD NEWS
  78. WHAT’S ULLAGE GOT TO DO WITH IT? - THE CURIOUS CASE OF 1928 LA GAFFELIÉRE NAUDES
  79. LIGHTNING STRIKES TWICE!
  80. WINE FRAUD – LIGHTNING STRIKES!
  81. WINE FRAUD – CAVEAT EMPTOR!
  82. BIRDS OF A FEATHER - LAUGHABLE WINE DESCRIPTIONS
  83. TIS THE SEASON!
  84. WHAT’S IN YOUR WINE BOTTLE?
  85. HAPPY NEW YEAR 2012!
  86. A NEW WINE FOR THE HOLIDAYS THAT HAS EVERYONE BUZZED
  87. WHAT IS A WINE CONSUMER TO DO?
  88. IS IT DRINK NOW AND PAY LATER? YOU BET YOUR SWEET BIPPY, BUT BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR!
  89. BE THE MASTER OF YOUR DOMAIN!
  90. TAKE A DIFFERENT VIEW THAT IS EASY ON YOUR PALATE AND ON YOUR WALLET
  91. ALONG THE BURGUNDY TRAIL - OCTOBER 2011
  92. Z IS FOR ZINFANDEL
  93. A NOTE FROM DARRELL CORTI
  94. THE BIRDS ARE STILL FLOCKING – WATCH OUT BELOW!
  95. SOME MORE BIG HOUSE RELATIVES PAY A VISIT TO THE UNDERGROUND
  96. WINE & CLOSURE
  97. YIKES! THE TIDE MAY BE GOING OUT SOON! WHO’S SWIMMING NAKED?
  98. WHAT IS WINE?
  99. HALLELUJAH!
  100. BLENDING GAME -- BLENDING MAN TO THE RESCUE
  101. HEARD ON THE GRAPEVINE
  102. NOW APPEARING AT A STORE NEAR YOU - DON'T CRY FOR ME ARGENTINA STARRING MALBEC & TORRONTES
  103. BLENDING PARTY – A NEW TWIST – FLASH DASH – WHAT'S IN YOUR GLASS?
  104. BBBB TRIBUTE
  105. OMG - IS IT THE END OF THE WORLD OR NOT?
  106. TAKE THE WINE CHALLENGE - BLENDING IS YOUR FRIEND!
  107. THE BORDEAUX ROAD AHEAD - A BUBBLE, A SPEED BUMP, OR BLISS?
  108. HERE AT LAST – BEYOND 100 POINTS – NIRVANA!
  109. BIRDS OF A FEATHER…
  110. FLASH! BIG NUMBERS WINE CRITIC ISSUES REPORT ON 2009 BEAUJOLAIS
  111. SPÄTBURGUNDER – WHAT IS IT?
  112. PINOT GRIS. IT'S FOR ME. DO YOU KNOW PINOT GRIS?
  113. THE BEAT GOES ON AND ON … “SUM YUNG VINE” X 2
  114. AND THE BEAT GOES ON…
  115. 100-POINT WINES – GET ‘EM WHILE YOU CAN!
  116. STORAGE, STORAGE, STORAGE!
  117. HAPPY THANKSGIVING! IT'S TIME TO GIVE THANKS AND ENJOY FOOD AND WINE!
  118. WOW! 2009 RED BURGUNDIES. STAY TUNED!!
  119. TIME TO GET INTO BEAUJOLAIS!
  120. A BARGAIN AT WHAT PRICE?
  121. VINOUS DRIVE-BY -- IT'S THE DRIVE-BY SIP AND SPIT!
  122. WINE TASTING OF THE MILLENNIUM
  123. ANSWER TO WINE TASTING OF THE MILLENNIUM
  124. PAST LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
  125. DEAR SANTA, WE'VE GOT A LITTLE LIST
  126. THE UNDERGROUND IS BACK!
  127. WHY THE “UNDERGROUND” WINELETTER? ARE WE TERRORISTS?

STUPID WINE DESCRIPTION OF THE YEAR?

John Tilson • 2/14/16        Print This Post Print This PostComment Bookmark and Share

questionMark-background

As we approach the 2016 Academy Awards, I am offering my selection of the Stupid Wine Description Of The Year.

oscar statue

After all, many wine descriptions have become as much of a fantasy land as Hollywood!

hollywood sign

And, at the end of this article I have a proposal for all of you that will be a lot of fun. But, first the Stupid Wine Description Of The Year which I received from a retailer with 1996 Krug for sale.

drum roll please

1996 KRUG 99+ points. “Light gold. Remarkably perfumed nose projects an exotic bouquet of deep, leesy yellow fruit, minerals, honeycomb, smoked meat and flowers, with Asian spices building expanding in the glass. Almost painfully concentrated, offering a surreal parade of orchard and pit fruits, smoked meat, toasted brioche and marrow braced by intensely salty, stunningly incisive minerality. Imagine a Frankenstein’s monster of Chablis Le Clos and Clos Ste. Hune – but one with perfect balance, of course – and you get an idea of what I found in my bottle. The energetic, stony character builds exponentially on the finish, which didn’t seem to, well, finish. The best analogy I can come up with for the intensity, focus and clarity of this Champagne is liquefied barbed wire. Utterly hallucinatory and one of the most amazing wines I’ve ever been fortunate enough to drink. At the risk of sounding completely out of touch with reality, this is a value.”

This was my choice among the many that came my way last year. And, the only way I see these descriptions is accompanied by offers for wines for sale on the internet and in auction catalogs. When I began The Underground Wineletter in 1979 I stopped subscribing to any wine publications. The reason was simple. You see The Underground Wineletter came into being only because my friends and I did not find any wine publication helpful in making our wine decisions. And, as a wine publication totally focused on consumers like ourselves, I did not want to have any outside influences tainting my findings and opinions (click on the following article – from Volume 1, Number 4 over 35 years ago and reprinted when we first started the online Underground  – to read my article outlining our mission: WHY THE ”UNDERGROUND” WINELETTER? ARE WE TERRORISTS?). The original philosophy has carried through to today and I see no reason to change. For information about wine, I pay attention to my wine drinking friends and people in the trade whom I know and trust. That’s it. Other than that, I am on my own.

Before I dig into the stupid description of the 1996 Krug, I have a confession to make right up front: I love Champagne, I love Krug Champagne, and I love 1996 Krug Champagne. Champagne and Krug Champagne has been a big part of my adult life for over 40 years (to read a recent article on Krug Champagne click here). The Underground Wineletter was in the forefront of writing and recommending Champagne as a wine to drink with food and not just for celebrations. In fact, in our third issue December-January 1979-1980 we said CHAMPAGNE It Has No Peer And Nothing Else Deserves The Name (to read the article click here). Today one room in my wine cellar is devoted almost entirely to Champagne and we drink Champagne nearly every day. In fact, our motto is “every day is a good day to drink Champagne!” So I have some skin in the game here.

And when I got this offer to purchase 1996 Krug, I was simply aghast at the description! No 1996 Krug Champagne tastes like this. In fact, no other Krug Champagne tastes like this. And, for that matter, of the zillions of bottles of Champagne that I have enjoyed over the years, no Champagne has ever tasted even remotely like this. If they did, I doubt Champagne would even exist! In fact, the worst bottles of Champagne that I have ever tasted are not nearly as bad as this description implies.

Thank goodness that this 100 point addict gave us the color, a comparison with 2 white wines, and at the beginning the name of the Champagne. Otherwise, no one would have had an idea of what he was talking about. But that actually would have been a good thing. Since, based on this description, the wine is disgusting and something I would not want even to get close to, much less drink. And, I would guess that would apply to most people with a sense of taste.

Let’s see. How can we count the ways that this description is stupid. Let’s start with “smoked meat and marrow”? Did this get mixed up with some stupid description of a red fruit bomb? And “intensely salty”? YUK! This is something we are supposed to drink not wash our feet in!! How about “liquefied barbed wire”? YIKES! “Almost painfully concentrated…” Are we into S&M here? “Utterly hallucinatory…” Is this the liquid to wash down recreational drugs? This description is stupid on nearly every count and intensifies as it goes on!

But, there is no truth here that I can see. In fact, this kind of commentary is so blatantly stupid that I cannot understand how anyone can pay attention to it. And, why would ANYONE pay money to get this information??? Can it be that maybe some people cannot read text and only count backwards from 100? But, then I thought that this was what the doctor told you to do after you had big whiff of gas to put you out? Even so, why 99+ points? I guess if the 1996 Krug Champagne threw you into convulsions, scratched off your skin, and put a ring in your nose, it would have gotten a 100! Stupid is as stupid does!!

The 1996 Krug wine description originally had the author’s name attached. I removed the name since this is not a personal commentary and only one example of the many absurd wine descriptions used by the various 100 point boys to sell wines. Click on the following articles to read many other ridiculously funny wine descriptions:

BIRDS OF A FEATHER…  

THE BIRDS ARE STILL FLOCKING – WATCH OUT BELOW!

BIRDS OF A FEATHER – LAUGHABLE WINE DESCRIPTIONS

And click onto the following to read about wine writing:

WINE WRITING – WHAT IS IT?   

So with that as a background, let’s start a little information gathering campaign. Here’s my proposal: Whenever you find a wine description that you think totally misses the mark in describing the wine send it to The Underground Wineletter at the following address john@undergroundwineletter.com  

Here are the rules:

  • You must send the description in its entirety and also send the source of the description, the date, the author, and how you received it (as a subscriber, through an offer to sell wine, from an auction catalog, etc.).
  • Following The Underground policy, the author’s name will not be used nor will the name of the person who submits the description unless requested.
  • As the year progresses I will publish the most bizarre and extreme examples (aka “Stupid”) as “Reader Choices”. And, at the beginning of next year, the winner will be announced.

So, lighten up. Let’s have some fun. Let the games begin!

let the games begin

In Vino Veritas,Sig

John Tilson

Post a Comment

4 comments for “STUPID WINE DESCRIPTION OF THE YEAR?”

  1. You have a problem with “liquefied barbed wire?”

    When I spent a few years in the gulag, we definitely could relate to this, once the tundra melted in the spring.

    CARY

    Posted by cary feibleman | February 15, 2016, 7:45 am
  2. Cary,
    Yes I have a problem with “liquified barbed wire” no matter where it might be.
    Sorry I missed your gulag experience. I think I was probably drinking German ice wine then!
    In Vino Veritas,
    John

    Posted by John Tilson | February 23, 2016, 6:32 pm
  3. Before Premier Cru imploded, they actually awarded that “Review of the Year”, so you obviously lack their level of taste.

    All kidding aside, that particular critic is a better reviewer than that, so it is odd. My only guess is that because it’s from 2007 he might have been caught up in the euphoria of the world as it was, pre-economic collapse.

    Posted by Michael Carpenter | March 6, 2016, 3:45 pm
  4. Thanks Michael,
    “Review of the Year”? Surely you jest. Well, if not, one thing is for sure. There will be no more Reviews of the Year from this source!
    We know the reviewer. My answer is that there is not 10 cents worth of difference between all the 100 point boys. Taste and spit in massive tastings and descriptions that make no sense do nothing for me. But, I am a equal opportunity critic so I am always open to change. So far, I can see nothing that leads me in that direction. “Drink what you like and like what you drink.” That’s all that matters.
    In Vino Veritas,
    John

    Posted by John Tilson | March 15, 2016, 6:18 pm

Post a Comment