A Guide to Wine, Food & the Good Life
To subscribe and be notified anytime we post a new article, enter your email address in the box below, then click on Subscribe Now.

Underground Wine Line

Similar Articles:

  1. 2016 STUPID WINE DESCRIPTION AWARD WINNERS AND MORE!
  2. HAPPY NEW YEAR 2017!
  3. BURGUNDY – 2016 VISIT
  4. YIKES! THE 1000 POINT WINE SCORE IS HERE
  5. CHAMPAGNE DAY 2016
  6. OUTSTANDING OLD MARSANNAY ROSÉS
  7. A MONTE BELLO TOAST TO PAUL DRAPER
  8. THE PERILS OF FARMING – MOTHER NATURE DEVESTATES BURGUNDY
  9. DO YOU KNOW WHAT TIME OF YEAR IT IS ON THE WINE CALENDAR?
  10. THE DAILY MEAL WINERY AWARDS
  11. STUPID WINE DESCRIPTION OF THE YEAR?
  12. HAPPY NEW YEAR 2016!
  13. ENCORE: DEAR SANTA, WE’VE GOT A LITTLE LIST
  14. BACK TO THE FUTURE
  15. A VIEW OF THE 2015 BURGUNDY VINTAGE IN ADVANCE OF THE ANNUAL UNDERGROUND WINELETTER TRIP TO BURGUNDY TO TASTE THE 2014S
  16. I HATE TO TELL YOU “I TOLD YOU SO” BUT “I TOLD YOU SO!”
  17. WHAT’S IN YOUR WINE GLASS?
  18. MORE ON BIB WINE
  19. THE JUDGMENT OF MOSCOW
  20. ROSÉ WINES AND THE GREAT ROSÉS OF PROVENCE
  21. A SHOT OUT OF THE BLUE: WE HAVE A NEW ENTRY IN THE WINE INGREDIENT LABELING DERBY
  22. PREMOX: “WHEREFORE ART THOU?”
  23. HAPPY NEW YEAR 2015!
  24. PREVIEW: ALONG THE BUGUNDY TRAIL VINTAGE 2013
  25. CAUTION! WHAT’S IN YOUR WINE?
  26. FOR THE LOVE OF ROSÉS
  27. THE BEST WINERIES IN AMERICA - THE TOP 3 ARE FROM CALIFORNIA'S CENTRAL COAST!
  28. STOP THE PRESSES! THERE IS A NEW SCORING SYSTEM!
  29. WINE WRITING – WHAT IS IT?
  30. POLYESTER WINES
  31. HAPPY NEW YEAR 2014!
  32. THE UNDERGROUND IS BACK!
  33. CALLING TIME OUT
  34. ROSÉ - IT’S TIME HAS COME
  35. ARE NUTRITIONAL LABELS COMING TO ALCOHOLIC DRINKS?
  36. THE BLENDING GAME: ROSÉ & MORE
  37. ATTENTION ALL WINE CONSUMERS: WINE INGREDIENT LABELING IS HERE!
  38. EXCLUSIVE NEWS FLASH!
  39. THE GREATER FOOL?
  40. DOMAINE ALBERT GRIVAULT
  41. TASTING WINE VS. DRINKING WINE - IS THERE A DIFFERENCE?
  42. A PAIR TO DRAW TO & A GUIDE FOR WHAT TO LOOK FOR IN WINES THAT ARE FOOD FRIENDLY, BALANCED, AND CAPABLE OF AGING FOR AN EXTENDED TIME
  43. HAPPY NEW YEAR 2013!
  44. THE UNDERGROUND HISTORY AS WE BRIEFLY LOOK BACK AND THEN CONTINUE TO FOCUS ON THE FUTURE
  45. BYE BYE BIG KAHUNA
  46. A LOOK AT NV CHAMPAGNE – IS IT REALLY DIFFERENT THIS TIME?
  47. FAKE WINES IN CHINA - THE BEAT GOES ON
  48. 2011 BURGUNDY – THE SURPRISE VINTAGE
  49. THE MARRIAGE BLEND
  50. LOOKING FOR OLD WINE WITH IMPECCABLE PROVENANCE?
  51. WINE FRAUD AND A WINE DETECTIVE - THE STORY OF DON CORNWELL
  52. HISTORIC VINEYARD SOCIETY
  53. DON’T GET YOUR KNICKERS IN A TWIST!
  54. THE BLENDING GAME - IS IT TIME FOR THREE BUCK CHUCK?
  55. EVERYTHING YOU HAVE BEEN DYING TO KNOW ABOUT NEWLY RELEASED CALIFORNIA CHARDONNAYS!
  56. COUNTERFEIT WINE AND THE ROLE OF CHINA
  57. THE JUDGMENT OF PRINCETON
  58. WHEN TO TASTE, DRINK, & ENJOY YOUNG WINES & WHAT ABOUT ROSÉ?
  59. THE VINEYARD OR THE WINEMAKING? WHAT REALLY MATTERS?
  60. BLENDING GAME PREVIEW
  61. PREDICTING THE FUTURE!
  62. AMATEUR NIGHT AT THE WINE FOLLIES: THE ANSWER WAS LYING IN PLAIN SIGHT
  63. THE PERFECT WINE?
  64. ATTENTION COSTCO WINE SHOPPERS: WHEN IS A ROSÉ NOT A ROSÉ?
  65. NAPA VALLEY WINES – JUST WHEN I THOUGHT WE HAD SEEN EVERYTHING!
  66. THE WINE FRAUD STORY – THE BEAT GOES ON!
  67. DO WINE AND TOILET PAPER HAVE ANYTHING IN COMMON?
  68. WINE JUSTICE STRIKES!
  69. FOODIES FIGHTING FOR FOIE!
  70. CALLING ALL WINE INVESTORS
  71. ONE WINEDRINKER’S OBSERVATIONS OVER NEARLY 30 YEARS: TWO FACES OF FRAUD? MORE TO COME?
  72. NEWS FLASH -- NEW ALCOHOL WARNING LABELS FOR WINE MAY SOON BE ISSUED!
  73. ROSÉ IS THE PERFECT ANTI WINE
  74. AN ENIGMA WRAPPED IN A RIDDLE – CAN AN UGLY DUCKLING BECOME A SWAN?
  75. STOP THE WINE PRESS! THE FBI HAS MOVED TO STOP WINE FRAUD!
  76. 2004 WHITE BURGUNDIES: PREMOX OR NOT? THE BEAT GOES ON!
  77. GOOD NEWS BAD NEWS
  78. WHAT’S ULLAGE GOT TO DO WITH IT? - THE CURIOUS CASE OF 1928 LA GAFFELIÉRE NAUDES
  79. LIGHTNING STRIKES TWICE!
  80. WINE FRAUD – LIGHTNING STRIKES!
  81. WINE FRAUD – CAVEAT EMPTOR!
  82. BIRDS OF A FEATHER - LAUGHABLE WINE DESCRIPTIONS
  83. TIS THE SEASON!
  84. WHAT’S IN YOUR WINE BOTTLE?
  85. HAPPY NEW YEAR 2012!
  86. A NEW WINE FOR THE HOLIDAYS THAT HAS EVERYONE BUZZED
  87. WHAT IS A WINE CONSUMER TO DO?
  88. IS IT DRINK NOW AND PAY LATER? YOU BET YOUR SWEET BIPPY, BUT BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR!
  89. BE THE MASTER OF YOUR DOMAIN!
  90. TAKE A DIFFERENT VIEW THAT IS EASY ON YOUR PALATE AND ON YOUR WALLET
  91. ALONG THE BURGUNDY TRAIL - OCTOBER 2011
  92. Z IS FOR ZINFANDEL
  93. A NOTE FROM DARRELL CORTI
  94. THE BIRDS ARE STILL FLOCKING – WATCH OUT BELOW!
  95. SOME MORE BIG HOUSE RELATIVES PAY A VISIT TO THE UNDERGROUND
  96. WINE & CLOSURE
  97. YIKES! THE TIDE MAY BE GOING OUT SOON! WHO’S SWIMMING NAKED?
  98. WHAT IS WINE?
  99. HALLELUJAH!
  100. BLENDING GAME -- BLENDING MAN TO THE RESCUE
  101. HEARD ON THE GRAPEVINE
  102. NOW APPEARING AT A STORE NEAR YOU - DON'T CRY FOR ME ARGENTINA STARRING MALBEC & TORRONTES
  103. BLENDING PARTY – A NEW TWIST – FLASH DASH – WHAT'S IN YOUR GLASS?
  104. BBBB TRIBUTE
  105. OMG - IS IT THE END OF THE WORLD OR NOT?
  106. TAKE THE WINE CHALLENGE - BLENDING IS YOUR FRIEND!
  107. THE BORDEAUX ROAD AHEAD - A BUBBLE, A SPEED BUMP, OR BLISS?
  108. HERE AT LAST – BEYOND 100 POINTS – NIRVANA!
  109. BIRDS OF A FEATHER…
  110. FLASH! BIG NUMBERS WINE CRITIC ISSUES REPORT ON 2009 BEAUJOLAIS
  111. SPÄTBURGUNDER – WHAT IS IT?
  112. PINOT GRIS. IT'S FOR ME. DO YOU KNOW PINOT GRIS?
  113. THE BEAT GOES ON AND ON … “SUM YUNG VINE” X 2
  114. AND THE BEAT GOES ON…
  115. 100-POINT WINES – GET ‘EM WHILE YOU CAN!
  116. STORAGE, STORAGE, STORAGE!
  117. HAPPY THANKSGIVING! IT'S TIME TO GIVE THANKS AND ENJOY FOOD AND WINE!
  118. WOW! 2009 RED BURGUNDIES. STAY TUNED!!
  119. TIME TO GET INTO BEAUJOLAIS!
  120. A BARGAIN AT WHAT PRICE?
  121. VINOUS DRIVE-BY -- IT'S THE DRIVE-BY SIP AND SPIT!
  122. WINE TASTING OF THE MILLENNIUM
  123. ANSWER TO WINE TASTING OF THE MILLENNIUM
  124. PAST LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
  125. DEAR SANTA, WE'VE GOT A LITTLE LIST
  126. THE UNDERGROUND IS BACK!
  127. WHY THE “UNDERGROUND” WINELETTER? ARE WE TERRORISTS?

PAST LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

John Tilson • 12/15/09        Print This Post Print This PostComment Bookmark and Share

Over the years, with the old Underground Wineletter, we received many interesting letters.  Some complimentary, some less so, some critical, some constructive, etc.  I think you get the picture.  From this, I chose a selected cross section of letters to publish written replies.  One of these appeared in Volume III, #1 in 1981.

We decided to call this feature “Cork Poppers,” and it proved very popular with our subscribers.  We plan to continue this feature as a regular part of our web site.  And, to get started, we are kicking off with a real classic Cork Poppers from Volume, X, #1, in1988.

Cork Poppers

 

Dear Mr. Tilson,

At a recent tasting of Rhone wines of our tasting group, a copy of your Wine Journal was present.  We were all shocked  to notice that all of your introductory comments on the Rhone wines appeared to have been lifted directly from Robert Parker’s book on The Rhone Valley and Provence.  As a professor of English, I wonder if this is not blatant plagiarism.  Surely, it would have been appropriate to place a footnote acknowledging your sources in the proper academic manner.  By copy of this letter, we’re advising Mr. Parker and his publisher of this abuse.

On an unrelated matter, members of our tasting group who collectively receive a half dozen differing wine publications, have concluded that no publication has declined in quality as much as yours.  Ten years ago it was close in quality to Parker’s Wine Advocate.  Today your crass commercialism, preschool writing style (all the tasting notes sound the same), and constant cheap shots at Parker, have all made us conclude that you have turned into small, jealous, bitter people who have forgotten what a consumer advocate is all about.  Perhaps it is time for you to call it quits rather than become the National Enquirer of wines.

Sincerely yours,

Nancy Maile

Portland, OR

_____________________________________________

Dear Professor Maile:

I am in receipt of your little diatribe of June 13, 1988.  I must say in opening that your understanding of basic journalistic fundamentals is sadly lacking for a person of even rudimentary understanding, much less of your supposed “Professor of English” status.  Moreover, may I suggest that you check your facts thoroughly before even thinking of accusing anyone of plagiarism, much less of “blatant plagiarism.”

In my ten years of involvement with this wine publication we’ve been called many things, but your accusation of plagiarism is simply absurd.  All tasting notes are ours entirely, and factual information regarding production, vineyard acreage, etc., is obtained either from producers, negociants, wholesalers, or importers, or from various industry publications.

However, I am sure the ubiquitous Mr. Parker appreciates having such an alert and protective watch dog up there in Portland, ready to come to his defense at the drop of a cork.  And, I also feel compelled to congratulate you on your mastery of superlatives and exaggerations, lessons well learned, no doubt, from your listed sources of reading material.

With regard to your other comments, I can only say that your alleged familiarity with our publication leaves me a bit confused.  We show no record of you ever having been a subscriber.  And surely, with your academic background, you haven’t been violating copyright laws regarding reproduction of our Journal.  Therefore, I can only assume that you have confused us with one of the other publications referenced in your letter.

But, nonetheless, let me respond to your allegations.  First of all, we are many things, but I would hardly call us commercial.  I’ve never drawn a salary from this publication (10 years) and our editorial staff (with the exception of one person employed by the publisher) works without any compensation at all.  In short, we do it because we love what we’re doing, and not for the money.  If, in your view, this makes us guilty of  “crass commercialism,” I submit you’re confused on the meaning of this term as well.  Second, with regard to “preschool writing style,” I can only agree that we could invent terms as some wine writers are prone to do, and use terms that no one could possibly pretend to understand, or even use just a number to describe wines, but we just don’t find such elaborations or shortcuts either appropriate or descriptive.  We could also lace our commentary with an abundance of superlatives, but this is simply hype.  What we do try to do is describe what we see, smell, and taste as accurately and descriptively as possible, in understandable English.  And finally, regarding your allegation of “constant cheap shots at Parker,” I can only say that this is so blatantly absurd that I’m wondering if you might not be suffering from some unfulfilled maternal instincts!

So there it is, Professor, the cold, hard facts.  I hope this will serve to set the record straight, but since we’ve published our wine commentary without you for the past decade, I don’t really expect we’ll miss you much going forward, either.  However, I assure you that we will continue to taste and evaluate our wines, without any outside influence, for as long as our lives hold out.  We’re having a great time doing it and most certainly are not “small,” “jealous,” or “bitter,” as you accuse.  In fact, I am tempted to send you some candid photos just to prove this point.  And, if this interests you, please be so kind as to send me candid photos of yourself, as well as samples of your wine tasting expertise and wine writing style (preferably on your letterhead).  Then I’d say we’d be on a real even basis to continue our little pen pal club.  So, let me hear from you, if you’re up to it.  If not, I’ll understand.

Sincerely,

John Tilson

Well, I guess you can see the controversy here.  But, my published reply seems to have quieted the storm that seemed to have been brewing up in Oregon.  For we never did hear back from the good professor and I never got any candid photos!

Going forward, we welcome your comments and inquiries (positive or negative) – photos, we’ll leave to your discretion!

In Vino Veritas,

John Tilson

Post a Comment

No comments so far for “PAST LETTERS TO THE EDITOR”

Post a Comment